Men’s marriage derailed, divorce, refused to pay alimony is included in the list of discredit ca1806

A married man derailed divorce alimony was included in the introduction of dishonesty blacklist judge: Niu Jun, July 2000 and graduated from the Law School of Anhui University, Bachelor of law, the current industrial park of Suzhou people’s court court judge, has long been engaged in civil trial and enforcement work, has the rich experience of trial and execution. Recently, the Park Court judge received the application executor phone said they found a dishonest debtor list of the "Reds", Lumou, and seized and turned over to the police station. The implementation of the judge immediately rushed to the police station, control Lumou, and made on the spot on the 15 day detention decision. Thus, in the period of marriage, not negative family responsibilities, refused to pay alimony after divorce, emotionally "jiaotusanku", and the woman’s love period under the name of bad debts Lu Moumou finally eat the bitter fruit. After marriage derailed his wife asked for a divorce Lumou refused to pay alimony in 2010, Wang was introduced to Lumou, a few months after the two people together into the marriage hall. But in two years old son not long, Lumou began in common outside, often do not go home, sometimes don’t answer the phone. In 2014, Wang believes that the feelings between husband and wife have broken down, and Lumou for children is not responsible, requesting the court to order the two divorce, Lumou pay monthly alimony 1500 yuan. After the court presided over the mediation, the two sides agreed to a divorce, Lumou agreed to pay alimony per month RMB 1500 yuan. Pay to Lumou verbally agreed to alimony, but actually there is no act, 2016, Wang to the court for enforcement, asked Lumou a year in 2015 to pay the compensation fee of 18 thousand yuan, the executive judge found in the implementation process, Lumou is a case of the debtor, the implementation of the subject add up to nearly 200 thousand yuan, for the implementation of Lumou was about thirty years old single women. In order to prevent the emergence of similar cases, the court will Lumou included in the list of dishonest debtor, but Lumou has not appeared, although many people have provided for the implementation of relevant information, but on Lumou the exact address and other information is very vague, after the executive judge Lumou bank accounts, securities, real estate, vehicles the information found, in addition to a set of common property and the outsider, Lumou no other property available for execution. With the implementation of the judge case on a little further, they found that in addition to the alimony dispute, posing after Lumou outside there are many amazing things. See Lumou good 80 single female "Laolai" list has let down Lee is a senior white-collar charge, through social software to know the "Lumou in disguise", two people talking to a few days after the meet in the coffee shop. The first time we met, Lumou carefully posing a variety of brand-name products, the body, two people in the conversation, Lumou claiming his father is a civil servant, my mother is a doctor, family conditions, he was a businessman, but the truth is not the case. Lu also said the busy work, so much so that the unmarried person. Meet several times after dinner, Lumou lavish, people are very reliable, Lee soon and Lumou into love. One night, Lee and friends after the meal after passing the Xinghai Square to see large outdoor screen scrolling promises)

男子婚后出轨离婚拒付抚养费 被列入失信黑名单法官简介:牛军,2000年7月毕业于安徽大学法学院,法学学士,现任苏州工业园区人民法院执行庭审判员,长期从事民事审判、执行工作,具有丰富的审判、执行经验。近日,园区法院执行法官接到申请执行人电话称他们发现了失信被执行人黑名单上的“红人”——陆某,并将其扭送至派出所了。执行法官立刻赶到派出所,控制住了陆某,并当场作出对其拘留15日的决定。至此,在婚姻期,不负家庭责任,离婚后拒不支付抚养费,在感情上“狡兔三窟”,与女方恋爱期间假借各种名义借钱不还的陆某某终于自食苦果。婚后出轨妻子要求离婚陆某拒付抚养费2010年,王某经人介绍认识了陆某,几个月相处后两人步入了婚姻的殿堂。但是在儿子满两岁没多久,陆某就开始在外面拈花惹草,经常不回家,有时电话也不接。2014年,王某认为夫妻间感情已经破裂,且陆某对孩子也不尽责,请求法院判令两人离婚,陆某每月支付抚养费人民币1500元。后在法院主持调解下,双方协议离婚,陆某同意支付抚养费每月人民币1500元。陆某口头上答应的好好的支付抚养费,但实际却没有任何行动,2016年,王某向法院申请强制执行,要求陆某支付2015年一整年的抚养费1.8万元,执行法官在执行过程中发现,陆某是多个案件的被执行人,执行标的加起来近20万元,申请执行陆某的均为三十岁左右的单身女性。为防止出现类似案件,法院将陆某纳入失信被执行人名单,但是陆某一直不现身,虽然多个申请执行人都提供了相关信息,但是关于陆某确切住址等信息却十分模糊,之后执行法官调查了陆某的银行账户、车辆、证券、房产等信息发现,除了一套与案外人共有的房产外,陆某没有其他财产可供执行。随着执行法官对案件一点点深入,他们发现除了这起抚养费纠纷,“乔装”后的陆某在外面还有很多令人咋舌的事情。善良80后单身女看到陆某“老赖”名单却掉以轻心李某是一位来苏工作的高级白领,通过社交软件认识了“乔装”后的陆某,两人交谈数日后相约在咖啡厅见面。第一次见面,陆某精心“乔装”了一番,各种名牌精品加身,两人交谈中,陆某自称父亲是公务员,母亲是医生,家庭条件优越,自己是生意人,但是实情却并非如此。陆某还称平时工作比较忙,所以这么大了还是单身一个人。几次相约吃饭后,陆某出手阔绰,人也很可靠,李某很快便和陆某进入恋爱期。某天晚上,李某和朋友聚完餐后路过星海广场看到了户外大屏上滚动播放着失信被执行人名单,她无意间发现了陆某的名字赫然在列,晚上见到陆某后便询问起来怎么回事。陆某花言巧语,自称是做生意上资金周转不灵,欠了供货商一笔钱引起的纠纷。李某虽有疑惑,但是被陆某的谎言掩遮。过段时间,陆某声称自己家亲戚生病了需要一笔钱来开刀,因为自己的存款用来做生意周转不过来,让李某借3万元给他,并保证两个月之内就还给她,李某也没多想就将钱借给了陆某,陆某也出具了借条。可是两个月之后陆某只陆陆续续的还给李某8000元,还剩2.2万元一直不还,找各种借口搪塞,并渐渐从李某的生活中消失,这让李某忍无可忍,经过多方朋友打听,李某发现有一位和她经历相似的女生——萧某。朋友介绍理想男友没想到竟是渣男萧某是一位自立的女性,但是在感情上却比较空白。有一天,萧某的朋友小刘在一次行业聚餐上认识了陆某,在酒桌上陆某自称是生意人,自己家在苏锡常混得开,还自称自己是单身,感情上一直空白。小刘把陆某介绍萧某,说这个人很符合萧某的择偶标准,萧某立刻添加了陆某的微信,和陆某交谈起来。在交谈中,陆某很符合心目中对男友“成功、有责任心、帅气”的标准。几日后,两人相约吃饭,陆某出手阔绰,两人相约李公堤西餐厅,浪漫的烛光晚餐加上陆某的花言巧语,让萧某沉醉,不久两人便确认了男女朋友关系。几日后,陆某住进了萧某的房子,小日子过得甜蜜有滋味,但是随着彼此生活有更多的交集,萧某发现陆某有一些小行为有点可疑,例如在客厅看电视,突然电话响了,是一个没有备注的号码,陆某立刻拿起电话跑到阳台或者厨房关上门去接电话,如果萧某凑过去听,陆某立刻将电话挂断。还有陆某经常晚上不回来,萧某打电话过去询问陆某十分不耐烦。这一系列行为让萧某感到疑惑又费解,但是陆某“巧舌如簧”总是能够糊弄过去。有一天,陆某以自己做生意要周转资金为由向萧某借款7万元,并保证一个月内还清,并出具了借条为证。萧某同意借钱给他。钱借出去之后,陆某一直没有还钱,且多次拒接电话,一直遮遮掩掩的,忍无可忍的萧某诉至法院,要求陆某还钱,法院经审理判决陆某归还萧某欠款7万元,但是陆某一直没有履行,萧某只好申请强制执行。在此期间,萧某通过多方打听陆某的消息,再精明的花心汉也有疏漏,在一次陆某与他人的通话中,陆某无意间说出了自己的真实住址,在一旁的萧某的好友悄悄地记下并告诉了萧某。两位被骗女生相遇直呼上当就在萧某和李某都在打听陆某的消息时候,两个女生偶然相识,互相倾诉后发现被骗的“情节相同”,两位被骗感情的女生越想越气愤,商量要找陆某算账,因为萧某知道其住址便悄悄来到陆某的住址,无意间发现陆某的车正好开进小区,便立刻报警,警察传唤陆某到派出所接受调查,李某也闻讯赶到。执行法官赶到现场后因为陆某拒不履行多起案件的生效判决当场宣布对陆某拘留15日决定。第二天陆某的家人来到法院为陆某处理“感情上问题”,当他父母得知自己儿子的劣迹后,羞愧难当。最终他的家人同意支付王某的抚养费、李某、萧某等人的欠款共计人民币19万余元。法官说法针对上述当事人经历,主要做以下几点提醒。首先,恋爱交友需谨慎,对于网上认识或者经过朋友介绍的异性朋友最好多相处,多了解对方的家庭及工作等背景情况后,再进一步确认关系。发现对方有诈骗嫌疑的,应当注意搜集证据,并尽快报案。公检法在办理涉及公民隐私的案件时,会依法保护受害人的隐私,这一点不必担心。其次,重视交往对象的诚实守信记录,目前公民涉及诉讼的诚信记录已经可以公开查询。李某在无意间看到了陆某的失信信息,此时就应提高警惕,在全国法院失信被执行人名单信息与查询网站查询具体的信息,或者拨打法院执行110进行咨询。不要轻信对方一面之词,以免被蒙蔽。最后,在交往期间发生借款等涉及金钱的关系,应严格按照法律规定要求对方出具借据等债权凭证,不要因为处于热恋期而被冲昏头脑。依照《最高人民法院关于审理民间借贷案件适用法律若干问题的规定》第二条的规定,出借人向人民法院起诉时,应当提供借据、收据、欠条等债权凭证以及其他能够证明借贷法律关系存在的证据。对于一般老百姓而言,保护自己的最好方式就是,要求对方出具借据,并将借款通过银行转账至借款人本人的账户。(本文感谢园区法院长成支持)相关的主题文章: